50mm and 35mm ?
- Thread starter yoshi82
- Start date
I own both 50 and 35mm lens. For 50 mm is more for portrait shot cos of it narrow focal Len compare with 35 of cos with more narrow focal length it will create better boken in portrait.
For 35mm is more for general indoor or low light where u don't have a big space to move ard so with slight wide focal length in 35 u will get better in your composition compare with a narrow 50mm.
For 35mm is more for general indoor or low light where u don't have a big space to move ard so with slight wide focal length in 35 u will get better in your composition compare with a narrow 50mm.
fyi, i pair a 24mm with a 50mm on my cropped body..
with 35mm indoor, there is little back room to move back to get more into the frame..
It's possible to do portrait with a 35mm. Just that the bokeh is not as nice as 50mm
I think a 24mm pair with a 50mm is great on the D90. An alternative is to use the 35mm with the 85mm. I'll go with the 24mm & 85mm!
Sigma 24mm 1.8 / Nikkor 24mm 2.8 / Nikkor 24mm 1.4
85mm 1.8 / 1.4 / Sigma 85mm 1.4 / Samyang 85mm 1.4
Classic recommendation - skip 1 focal length to get meaningful difference. For example: 24mm (28) 35 (50) 85 (105) 135 etc. () means skip. If money not an issue then the recommendation changes to buy the best you can afford in the range.
50/1.8 is cheap, 35/1.8 is not unaffordable. Should get both.
50/1.8 is cheap, 35/1.8 is not unaffordable. Should get both.
That is of course Sir, u can also use 10mm fisheye and 600mm tele for both portrait and landscape. It's individual.
Last edited:
Akatsuki said:
Of course sir, just that u will get a stretch faces with FE lens and need a long clear path with the 600mm. To each his own.
It's more of a matter of style of shooting. It's a very good lens, but if it doesn't suit your style of shooting, you'll just waste your money on it.
haha, to each his own, so TS have to decide which 1 he likes better.
Similar threads
