1. I didn't say cats make more noise than dogs. (just clarifying)
2. I mentioned cats have the ability to steal food, in situations that is unlikely for dogs (dogs part is implied).
I put up video links to display the agility of cats, and what the cats capable of.
If you say it is not "beyond reasonable doubt" that cats are more agile than dogs, and that cats are capable of what dogs are not capable of, despite the evidences, it's fine. I have no issue with that.
3. I suggest that cats are more nuisance than dogs in initial post. Later, I put up the link showing the stats of cats complaint in SG context. A google search shows no similar stats results for dogs. I infer from there that Cats is of more problem than dogs in HDB estates.
If you say that it is not a "strong" supporting point. that is fine. No issue with that. These article for for pple to see and judge themselves. You can raise your opinions, comments, and I may or may not counter or further extend my arguments.
The important thing is, it is never about winning the argument. It is just presentation of opinion and fact to support one's argument only.
4. I presented unpleasant encounters of cats stealing food. You don't believe, ok. You request more evidence than words, fine. I may not may not provide more evidences to make it more convincing, depending on whether I want to convince you.
You can say it is isolate incident, not applicable to general sense. that is fair too.
But, If you accusing me of telling "stories", that is not right. It is akin to accusing of someone telling lies, a defamation of one's character.
Finally, there is no need to issue offending insults/accusations in a discussion. I feel. Unless provoked in such said fashion.