I was thinking of getting one of those 70-200 2.8 lenses (Nikon) and now deciding between Nikon's VR and Sigma's Macro
Nikon's VR more expensive, but it's got VR...
Sigma's Macro seems like an interesting idea, especially when coupled with a teleconverter...
so my question is to those who use either, is the VR that useful? and is the Macro any good?
i'm thinking if i shoot any form of sports i'm going to need a high shutter speed, and i don't see myself shooting anything particularly slow at such a zoom. and i can see myself at least starting to try macro photography
Nikon's VR more expensive, but it's got VR...
Sigma's Macro seems like an interesting idea, especially when coupled with a teleconverter...
so my question is to those who use either, is the VR that useful? and is the Macro any good?
i'm thinking if i shoot any form of sports i'm going to need a high shutter speed, and i don't see myself shooting anything particularly slow at such a zoom. and i can see myself at least starting to try macro photography