the lousy chef cuts himself deeper with an expensive and sharp knife, at least with a cheap and blunt knife, the cut is less painful
Couldn't have said it better myself! :thumbsup:
the lousy chef cuts himself deeper with an expensive and sharp knife, at least with a cheap and blunt knife, the cut is less painful
the lousy chef cuts himself deeper with an expensive and sharp knife, at least with a cheap and blunt knife, the cut is less painful
Actually, more times than not, cuts are caused by cheap and blunt knives rather than with sharp and really good knives. You don't have to hack with a sharp knife whereas you need to do so with a blunt one. If you hack, then the chances of a mishap is naturally higher.
So the moral of the story is that although any camera can make good pictures, the chances with a good (and naturally more expensive) camera giving you better pictures are higher!
you don't get it ... oh well, nevermind
Actually he was just discussing why the analogy, like many others in this thread, is flawed
you're not him, how do you know?
Actually he was just discussing why the analogy, like many others in this thread, is flawed
U read my mind.. :sweatsm: Just wondering Are we being poison by the BBB virus. Lots of ppl tat pose here uses XXX lenses. So did it give a strong signal tat we should use them if wanted to get good photo? Did u ever came across ppl saying that he uses, maybe say 28-85 f3.5, when he poses a picture here...:dunno:
Use the right equipment for the right job at the right time. Ask urself if u'd like to go on a relaxing holiday carrying 4x 1000watt studio lights, a 1DsMkII with 2 sets of 10 different primes of different focal lengths and apertures.
some photos just cant be taken with a cheapo while some ppl over kills shooting with expensive camera.
eg; a static flower can be shot with any camera with a close up lens. so if you compare shooting it with a 1DMK3, thats an overkill. you dont need the fast focusing, the 10fps etc.
So bottom line is do you know what is your camera designed for. You cant generallise the whole photography into using cheap or expensive camera. Anyway, cheap or expensive does not really exist in photography, the correct words should be Good or lousy. But usually the lousy ones are cheap while the good ones are expensive.. Note the word usually... not always.
I do not want to argue and I had used lousy lens with disapointed results before. Overall it cost me more $$$ in the long run using lousy equipments.