Actually, there are occasionally MOs for TY discs on HWZ, I just got a rim of Sony Accucore 8x +Rs from there.
Just curious, are there still any Mitsuis lying around?
Just curious, are there still any Mitsuis lying around?
The newer "Taiwanese" Fujifilm DVD disks are made by Prodisk using Fuji's own dye. I have tested a few of them (both +/- disks). Not bad... very low error. Comparable to TYs in term of quality.Adam Goi said:Yah lor ... the newer ones are made in Taiwan ... no more TYs ... :cry:
what the heck is Taiyo Yuden... someone educate me can...?Adam Goi said:Yah lor ... the newer ones are made in Taiwan ... no more TYs ... :cry:
Taiyo Yuden (TY) is a contract manufacturer of very high quality optical disks. In the past, some of the brand names made by TY were Sony, Mitsui, Yamaha, Pioneer, Fujifilm and Toshiba (available in Japanese market only). Their older black-surfaced Mitsui CD-R disks are considered by many as one of the most archival CD-R disk ever made. I still have about 200 pieces of it.Larry said:what the heck is Taiyo Yuden... someone educate me can...?
Yes... I concur with your statement. Benq seems to be leading the way in DVD writer now because of its low price and high performance. If you want quality, NEC makes very good writers. All the latest Sony writers are made by Lite-On JVC.feryl said:...the DVD writer does make a big difference too...
Yes, this is possible. The dye on DVD+/-R is thinner than those used on CD-R. A tighter tolerance is, therefore, required to manufacture DVDs. You can buy "el-cheapo" CD-Rs and live with it, but you cannot buy cheap DVDs and expect it to last. So far, only a few manufacturers tested are said to last more than 5 years. TY is one of them.hifisiao said:I see here that some bros have DVDs that deterioriated after burning? Is that possible?????
destiny_star said:Sorry if this sounds abit OT, but juz wondering which DVD type is more suitable for backing up data and photos?
DVD+R or DVD-R?? thanx.
Limsgp said:I guess DVD+R is more suitable for computer applications. Read from somewhere that DVD+R standard is designed for computer data, whereas DVD-R is meant for Videos, althou most readers/writers nowadays is compatible with both.
And, personally I would choose DVD+R simply because it is faster ( Most DVD+R is 8× speed, whereas DVD-R is 4× Speed)
And DVD+RW is 4× whereas DVD-RW is only 2×. And they cost about the same.
So, that could be an indication that DVD+R is indeed designed for computers/Data purposes.
Regards
that time I bought DVD-RW 4x is the same price as DVD+RW 4xLimsgp said:And DVD+RW is 4× whereas DVD-RW is only 2×. And they cost about the same.
nuts said:Well, its not just being able to burn w/o errors etc
Using Benq writer and Verbatim DVD-R, I had archive my photos on several disks... can read no problems etc... One year later, all of them is unreadable!!
Bottomline, whichever DVDs u using, check them every year