I don't think even this lens can help you..the tsunami can reach as far in as 5-8km inland. Maybe more.ParkertR said:Hmm... personally I would run away to tell of the story with or without pictures, another day. But if I could take pictures... hehe i'd have this mother of a lens, stand on higher ground and shoot!
bensen-burner said:I would.... the shot is worth it. Where is your sence of adventure. I leave my fate in the hands of the photography gods.
Malakite said:i would... , i've just returned from my trip to thailand, really really regret my side trip to phuket, just stood there like an idiot with my camera shooting the wave , until i realise that it was gonna be too late turned and tried to run. onli to trip and fall into the water... my camera is lost... but i still have my life... thank god for that.
Sion said:Which God of Photography?
Canon or Nikon?
true true...AReality said:Just use common sense. It works in a majority of the situations.
Also need to realise that award winning shots need not include the huge waves.
bensen-burner said:I would.... the shot is worth it. Where is your sence of adventure. I leave my fate in the hands of the photography gods.
skyflash said:I think this case is the "sudden" low tide which was the signal. By the time the killer wave arrives, it is too late. Some survivors actually ran "hundreds of metre" from the "shore line".