Would you prefer 10-20mm or fisheye?
- Thread starter RayDream
- Start date
- Status
it depends on the camera you would be using.. On a full frame, in my personal opinion 10mm is too wide.. however on a 1.6x camera, 10mm makes it equivalent to 16mm which is very desirable wide angle..
Personally I like extreme wides and fiseyes both..
Personally I like extreme wides and fiseyes both..
I prefer an ultra wide-angle zoom lens because it is more versatile and I get more use of it than a fisheye.
With a DSLR and Panorama Tools freeware, it hardly matters nowadays.
You gain detail introducing fisheye distortion into a rectilinear picture and lose detail making a fisheye straight. So an ultrawide angle is better. Will show photos to demonstrate what I mean later this afternoon.
You gain detail introducing fisheye distortion into a rectilinear picture and lose detail making a fisheye straight. So an ultrawide angle is better. Will show photos to demonstrate what I mean later this afternoon.
in term of wideness
on 1.5x crop APS-C sensor, 10-20mm
on full frame, 16mm Fish Eye
on flexibility, 10-20mm.
on creativity, Fish Eye.
on 1.5x crop APS-C sensor, 10-20mm
on full frame, 16mm Fish Eye
on flexibility, 10-20mm.
on creativity, Fish Eye.
- Status
Similar threads
