Intentionally left out, coz this WILL garner the most votes. So no point there. ;pOriginally posted by Red Dawn
hmmm....how about the advent of digital sensors capable of capturing images as a replacement for film?
In what situation does, say, f5.6 increase the DOF of a telephoto lens to a significant extent such that it becomes acceptable whereas 2.8 on a 200mm isn't?Originally posted by darr
there are times when I took shots from my 75-300 IS instead of using the 70-200 at 2.8 coz the depth is juz too shallow.
Oh yeah, certainly, I'm not disputing that.Originally posted by camera1001
Jed, I've never read your previous posts or whatever prior to this but I think different pple feel differently on technologies that work for them.