The NEW Nikon D7000 or Nikon D300s ?

[jeff7id]

As on aug 2011,
D7k body, quoted 1.7k+
D300s body, quoted 1.66k+
From cp.

Now D7000 is more expensive than D300s ?
You are kidding me, right ?

 

[GReddyZC76]

Now D7000 is more expensive than D300s ?
You are kidding me, right ?

Ohhh typo... Typo...
The other way round..
D300s is 1.7k + (have 2sd 8gb sd card + kata 123-go-10 bag)
D7k, 1.6k+ (only 1 sd card - shld be 8g).

Hehee.

 

[mazeppa26]

d7000

 

[Lestn]

D300s for ergonomics

 

[baolong]

How about in term of image quality when both shoot at jpeg at iso1600 (this is the setting I use most for night photography)? Most of the reviews are shot at raw which is not relevant to me,

 

[rasdeep]

d7000 yield better high ISO pictures regardless in RAW or jpeg

 

[diglomex]

D7K won an award
EISA Awards European Advanced SLR Camera 2011-2012

 

[homan]

Of cause D7000
Camera,I like New.
Lens,I like old.

 

[LUNATIK76]

Frankly, I've used both. I still prefer d7k in overall performance. As d300s has limited low light capabilities... But again, build quality for d300s is far more better.

 

[small pig]

I still recommend d7k. Reasons being, lighter and more flexible in term of video and higher ISO capability. Though I have to agree tat d300 have a better feel and better Af. But for me I prefer to use 1point Af which is e centre, as its e fastest and accurate