shall i get tamron 18-270mm instead of tamron 17-50mm?
need a wide aperture lens and oso can zoom more. able to bring around easily
need a wide aperture lens and oso can zoom more. able to bring around easily
need a wide aperture lens and oso can zoom more. able to bring around easily
actually i have tamron 17-50mm and canon 50mm f1.8, just feel like selling my tamron 17-50mm to buy tamron 18-270mm
afraid the legendary tamron 10-800mm f/1.4 has not been built yet.
actually i have tamron 17-50mm and canon 50mm f1.8, just feel like selling my tamron 17-50mm to buy tamron 18-270mm
18-270mm is good for general purpose, but you traded more reach for IQ compared to the 17-50mm.
The 17-50mm is faster and sharper in low light. cos of the constant f2.8
At the long end... under low light. the 18-270mm hunts like crazy but if you're traveling and only wants to carry 1 lens for all purpose, this might be your ticket.
actually i have tamron 17-50mm and canon 50mm f1.8, just feel like selling my tamron 17-50mm to buy tamron 18-270mm
need a wide aperture lens and oso can zoom more. able to bring around easily
just curious guys, interested in getting 17-50mm f2.8 non-VC, do u think the difference in IQ is noticeable compared to 18-55mm 3.5-5.6? and ive heard people saying to get the non-VC edition cos of the iq as well any ideas?
If you already have a 17-50mm f/2.8, then just get a cheap zoom like the Sigma/Tamron 70-300mm. That way, when you need a fast lens for those tricky situations, you'd still have your 17-50mm f/2.8 as backup.