Yeah, they're a mixture. But a lot are in the various flikr street photography pool though. The one entitled "Leaving" reminds me a lot of Yapster's shot of the guy reading under the F1grandstand in CS Streets gallery. :think:
He took pictures of strangers from sometime, and does some nice portraits, some posed, some not, though he has a very large pool and I did not view the ones before june 08.
I do not see him as a street photographer. Take a look at HCSP to see what really is.
I think the general issue is that most people still do not have a clear idea what street photography really is. I used to think I was doing street photography when photographing people, but a lot of them are actually just pictures of strangers on the street with only a handful impactful enough(just) to break out of the mould. I posted them to groups which think those are street photos, but they are groups for viewers who thought it is, when in reality is not.
This was the page of photos which Markus Hartel notices my works and make me a contact:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/geraldlj/page4/
Compare my old page to this image of his:
Apart from the gimmickly color processing that I use, do you notice any difference?
I copied his shooting style, work about the same distance and shoot fast. Though I realize... Markus is always photographing something more than most of us.
Street photographs have more depth. I think a magnum article says more than I could.
http://blog.magnumphotos.com/2008/10/environmental_photography.html
If you think the article doesn't apply, think again.
PS: take most groups on flickr with a grain of salt. That goes with interestingness and number of comments and favs, especially when it comes down to street photography because most people are just as clueless.