Saw an interesting article by Reuters, titled : Japan Mid-Tier Camera Makers Face Shakeout as Smartphones Shatter Mirrorless Hopes,
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/12/29/business/29reuters-japan-cameras.html?hp&_r=1&
I can see the analyst's arguments, but is wondering how representative those sentiments are. The way I see it is, smart phones and mirrorless can co exist , as mirrorless was never meant to replace smartphones.
Not so sure about the article's perceive brand power as well. Nevertheless, a provocative article before the close of the year. Cheers
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/12/29/business/29reuters-japan-cameras.html?hp&_r=1&
I can see the analyst's arguments, but is wondering how representative those sentiments are. The way I see it is, smart phones and mirrorless can co exist , as mirrorless was never meant to replace smartphones.
Not so sure about the article's perceive brand power as well. Nevertheless, a provocative article before the close of the year. Cheers