Sigma 70 - 200 HSM APO or 70 - 200 HSM APO Macro


Status
Not open for further replies.

CreaXion

New Member
Jun 15, 2006
1,191
0
0
Planet Earth
#1
I am thinking of buying the Sigma 70 to 200 HSM APO Macro. Any comments from users. How close is the Macro ability in comparison with just dedicated Macro lens?
 

westwest1

Deregistered
Feb 25, 2006
2,616
0
0
@ AMK
#2
CreaXion said:
How close is the Macro ability in comparison with just dedicated Macro lens?
if looking for true macro...get a dedicated one better...
 

CreaXion

New Member
Jun 15, 2006
1,191
0
0
Planet Earth
#3
westwest1 said:
if looking for true macro...get a dedicated one better...
How is this set of lens for normal zoom usage? Does it have the same quality as the 70 to 200 HSM?
 

westwest1

Deregistered
Feb 25, 2006
2,616
0
0
@ AMK
#4
CreaXion said:
How is this set of lens for normal zoom usage? Does it have the same quality as the 70 to 200 HSM?
usually macro lens are prime lens...for example Nikkor 105mm VR is going around for $1300 IIRC..quality wise..prime lens wins..

sigma one I was quote 1600++ from MS colour...:sweat:
 

midicity

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
681
0
16
#5
westwest1 said:
usually macro lens are prime lens...for example Nikkor 105mm VR is going around for $1300 IIRC..quality wise..prime lens wins..

sigma one I was quote 1600++ from MS colour...:sweat:

If at $1600, i'd rather get a 2nd hand Canon 70-200mm L. It's about the same price and the optics should be better
 

CreaXion

New Member
Jun 15, 2006
1,191
0
0
Planet Earth
#6
midicity said:
If at $1600, i'd rather get a 2nd hand Canon 70-200mm L. It's about the same price and the optics should be better
For Nikon Mount only
 

westwest1

Deregistered
Feb 25, 2006
2,616
0
0
@ AMK
#7
well...i suggest you get the lens you need...if going for macro...get the 105VR one...

if for dual purpose...get the sigma one...
 

Apr 12, 2005
1,767
0
0
#9
For dedicated macro lenses, the maximum magnification is 1:1, meaning that you can work much closer to the subject than zoom lenses with macro ability (e.g. max. magnification for the Sigma 70-200mm Macro is 1:3.5 and the minimum focusing distance is 100cm compared to 1:1 for the Sigma 70mm Macro lens which has a minimum focusing distance of only 25.7cm).
 

CreaXion

New Member
Jun 15, 2006
1,191
0
0
Planet Earth
#10
Thanks for all the feedback. Already purchased the lens. Fantastic lens. Since I own both Canon and Nikon systems. The Sigma's focussing is faster than the F4L 70 to 200 in my opinion. Not sure whether fair comparison or not as the sigma is mounted on my Nikon's system
 

ykgen

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
529
0
0
36
KL, Penang
#11
CreaXion said:
Thanks for all the feedback. Already purchased the lens. Fantastic lens. Since I own both Canon and Nikon systems. The Sigma's focussing is faster than the F4L 70 to 200 in my opinion. Not sure whether fair comparison or not as the sigma is mounted on my Nikon's system

then which one is faster if the sigma compared to nikkor AFD 80-200 f2.8 and also AFS 70-200 f2.8?
 

ykgen

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
529
0
0
36
KL, Penang
#13
ExplorerZ said:
AFS 70-200 > Sigma 70-200 > AFD 80-200
oh.. so afd is the slowest af lens.. :sweat:

in term of pix quality? which one is faster?
 

ExplorerZ

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2006
7,752
0
36
West Legion
hkchew03.deviantart.com
#14
ykgen said:
oh.. so afd is the slowest af lens.. :sweat:

in term of pix quality? which one is faster?
erm afd is only slower by very slight bit

in terms of pic quality... how can it be fast? :sweat:
anyway its AFS 70-200 >= AFD 80-200 > Sigma 70-200

taking that all are good copies and at f2.8
 

ykgen

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
529
0
0
36
KL, Penang
#15
ExplorerZ said:
erm afd is only slower by very slight bit

in terms of pic quality... how can it be fast? :sweat:
anyway its AFS 70-200 >= AFD 80-200 > Sigma 70-200

taking that all are good copies and at f2.8
typo.. not faster but better ;p
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom