Hi Guys,
I was surprised how many people viewed the portraits which I submitted yesterday, "Portrait with a difference", so I thought I'd submit another couple.
Once again I am more concerned about portraying the person's personality rather than skin tones and pin-sharp eyelashes or a silly pose.
http://www.peteloud.co.uk/photos/Friends/Bea/Bea_pano.html
I hope that you all conclude that she is an artist who does not bow to a conventional consumerist lifestyle. But did you notice that among her books there are two books on Hitler? What does that suggest?
And here is something more conventional.
http://www.peteloud.co.uk/photos/Seahouses/Dobbin.html
That this has been successful masks the difficulty. It was taken, handheld at 1/4 sec. inside a small dark bar. The only illumination was from small windows. The guy was sat about 3 ft from me so I was using a standard lens, hence enlarged nose. It was probably taken on a 6x6 Bronica S2A in 1974.
I was surprised how many people viewed the portraits which I submitted yesterday, "Portrait with a difference", so I thought I'd submit another couple.
Once again I am more concerned about portraying the person's personality rather than skin tones and pin-sharp eyelashes or a silly pose.
http://www.peteloud.co.uk/photos/Friends/Bea/Bea_pano.html
I hope that you all conclude that she is an artist who does not bow to a conventional consumerist lifestyle. But did you notice that among her books there are two books on Hitler? What does that suggest?
And here is something more conventional.
http://www.peteloud.co.uk/photos/Seahouses/Dobbin.html
That this has been successful masks the difficulty. It was taken, handheld at 1/4 sec. inside a small dark bar. The only illumination was from small windows. The guy was sat about 3 ft from me so I was using a standard lens, hence enlarged nose. It was probably taken on a 6x6 Bronica S2A in 1974.