Hahaha what if the person doesn't know which lens to buy between 2, maybe doing a comparison. But he surely knows that he needs them? So he just need more suggestions.
Yes, Just like I ask about canon 10-22 and tokin 11-14.
Please advice!!!
- Thread starter Sing Liang
- Start date
Yes, Just like I ask about canon 10-22 and tokin 11-14.
Hahaha if you free can come out to shoot together, but I am very new to photography, so pardon me for my noobness. Hahaha at the same time can borrow your 10-22mm to poison myself a bit.
Hahaha like what the others have mentioned, if you are really lazy about bringing so many lenses out, then get 18-200 or something like that. It would be better. Hahaha
i feel that your logic is flawed. why do you need to bring all your lenses to wherever you go? pick and choose the appropriate ones for what you are going to shoot, no need to lug every single lens around.
and why 24-70L and 70-200L? sounds like some L-BBB to me.
and why 24-70L and 70-200L? sounds like some L-BBB to me.
are you willing to bear the weight? f2.8 zooms ain't feather light, 24-70L + 70-200 f2.8L - easily over 2.5kg, not counting camera body and other accessories.
go man-handle the lens first before you make any conclusion.
i opted for the 70-200L f4 IS version solely due to the weight and how travel friendly it is.
performance wise, it is 99% that of the f2.8 IS II, minus the wider aperture.
I don't really see what's the problem with this setup...was using the exact setup till my 18-55 died and upgraded it to 17-50. Chances are if my 18-55 did not get KIA, I may have stick with it.
No... He's referring to the focal length coverage of the lenses you have now... "Hmm, I think I just use 10-22, 18-55 and 55-250 for now."
Similar threads
