Thanks for the encouragement.
Really appreciate it to know that at least someone reads my rambling.
I almost always go for UWA/Normal/Short-Tele combis when on travel.
In this this case, 12,20,55,100mm.
I've got mixed feelings about the 12mm then 20mm combi.
On the one hand, the 20mm did lots (I've got more shots with it than the 12mm for this trip)
On the other hand, I feel that 24mm seems my preference.
More versatile as a street+landscape lens.
Less feel of perspective exaggeration too compared to 20mm (and that 12mm already is another one that exaggerates perspective).
That said, 20mm is the nicer lens over 24mm as the 'only' wide.
There would have been times I went out with the 20mm and left the 12mm in the room, where a 24mm would not have bagged a shot w/o thinking real hard to get things into the frame.
I also had a 28mm in the form of the Sigma DP1m. (backup camera)
However, I am not much of a 28mm guy (perhaps film days with 28mm as my widest option scared me off it even till today)
28mm never seem wide enough for city stuff. (and this was film days, so no pano stitch though I did shoot multiframes and pasted the prints into panos. )
For your intended travel kit, I do think its fine.
That FE28 looks great from what I can tell trying out at the store. (real nice other than the distortion which can be corrected in post)
You did not buy the UWA attachment?
I also see that you have left out a 'normal' (eg. 35mm or 50mm).
Perhaps the 28mm can do that duty depending on personal preference though.
Your kit certainly looks fine imo.
