E-510 + 14-42mm - $1,499 (RRP - street prices about $150 lower)
I wonder if this will negatively affect the K10D :|
E-510 + 14-42mm - $1,499 (RRP - street prices about $150 lower)
It's still 2x cropped right? The only reason I would leave K10D for E-510 is the live view:bsmilie: Live view + IS = great macro camera.
eh eh.. maybe can buy this, then go get an adapter for k mount lenses (Think got this lens)
Die lah, the more I think the more I heart itchy...
My fren was at Funan and the sales guy proved to him the noise performance of the 410 is better than the 510. Somehow when they introduced the stabilisation, ccd performance was affected. I must say though the camera is small and compact (so nice to hold in your hands!)
and weighs like the Panasonic FZ50...so light. The liveview is useful too but for the price, its better to pay lesser to get the K100D or pay a little more to get K10D although I must confess the Nikon D40x and E410/E510 does give pentax (and canon too!) a run for their money..
Never going back to prosumer liao. Since I still have the FZ7:bsmilie: My K10D should be in or on its way to Japan, & now running around with my gf K100D But can consider a E410/E510 body if got good buy:bsmilie: Then mount with my Pentax lenses:sweat:
lol.
perhaps the pentax cameras this year will have live view
lol.
perhaps the pentax cameras this year will have live view
I prefer K10D than E-510. E-510 has a very small viewfinder as compared to K10D. And it is troublesome to autofocus & shoot when using its live view function.
Zuiko Digital ED 35-100mm F2.0 -------- $3,200
Zuiko Digital ED 150mm F2.0 -------- $3,600
(oh. and the 300 2.8 is SGD 11K, which is. MAN.)
It's still 2x cropped right? The only reason I would leave K10D for E-510 is the live view:bsmilie: Live view + IS = great macro camera.
eh eh.. maybe can buy this, then go get an adapter for k mount lenses (Think got this lens)
Die lah, the more I think the more I heart itchy...
Didn't realise the E510 would have worse ISO performance. Even the E410 is only passable (i.e. broadly equivalent to other 10mp cams)
well, I think that if I were shooting sports (or for some reason needed lots of telephoto), and if the new "high end" olympus was at least 5 fps, I would be tempted because of the glass.
Stuff like:
Zuiko Digital ED 35-100mm F2.0 -------- $3,200
Zuiko Digital ED 150mm F2.0 -------- $3,600
--
Perhaps it's just because pentax has no long fast glass :| (not that I even need any )
(oh. and the 300 2.8 is SGD 11K, which is. MAN.)
It's not a 300/2.8 but a 300/4... and the 35-100/2 is a 70-200/4... Think about it... What a rip. :sweat: Had I have that kind of money, I'd rather go the other way to get EOS 5D+70-200/4.
2X crop factor, no go if you really think about it and want to shoot landscapes.
I just wish Pentax would get a full-frame. But unfortunately I don't think so, apparently Canon is also not going to do any more full-frame DSLRs from rumours I have heard. =(
It's not a 300/2.8 but a 300/4... and the 35-100/2 is a 70-200/4... Think about it... What a rip. :sweat: Had I have that kind of money, I'd rather go the other way to get EOS 5D+70-200/4.