Late last week I had lunch with someone who has the new Mk3 and he agreed to let me shoot the food for comparison with my mk2. I used the lens he brought - 24-70L. Despite wanting to like the new Mk3 and hoping to see a marked improvement in IQ, I did not see any. Maybe the food shoot was not for the mk3 best new features. But after that lunch, I am in no hurry to go buy the new Mk3. The AF is much faster. The shutter button is much more responsive. The body feel is just like a 7D. Unfortunately as I do not have the RAW converter nor does my ACR reads the new file format, I cannot process the Raw to compare. Judging only based on the jpgs.
I wonder if anyone here has done a side by side comparison of captures out of the camera to see where the new camera has improved?
I wonder if anyone here has done a side by side comparison of captures out of the camera to see where the new camera has improved?