Just want to add on to my previous post...
Basically, I don't really see the need to be in agreement or opposition to the result. Just take it as another way of comparing the universities.
However, in response to icer, just because it's published worldwide, it doesn't mean that it has to be accurate. Thousands of journals and papers are published worldwide every year, they don't necessary has to be the ultimate truth. They are still disputed and counter-argued all the same.
Just want to provide another illustration of another questionable part of the survey. In attracting foreign students and academics, is the cultural aspect of the equation being assessed too? If you were to consider attractiveness of universities, universities in unique-culture countries immediately suffer a handicap. For example, a lot of universities in Japan don't have a policy to attract foreign students. Does that mean universities like Kyushu Institute of Technology are considered less competent, even if they are one of the leading authorities on robotics? Or how many people will actually considering going to Yonsei University or KAIST in South Korea?
I say it's all relative. It's an option for people who can afford to choose where they want to go. For people who don't really have a choice to go, these ranking are almost irrevelant. However, being comfortable in a university doesn't mean that you can't be better off elsewhere. It's just that it's not an option.
Basically, I don't really see the need to be in agreement or opposition to the result. Just take it as another way of comparing the universities.
However, in response to icer, just because it's published worldwide, it doesn't mean that it has to be accurate. Thousands of journals and papers are published worldwide every year, they don't necessary has to be the ultimate truth. They are still disputed and counter-argued all the same.
Just want to provide another illustration of another questionable part of the survey. In attracting foreign students and academics, is the cultural aspect of the equation being assessed too? If you were to consider attractiveness of universities, universities in unique-culture countries immediately suffer a handicap. For example, a lot of universities in Japan don't have a policy to attract foreign students. Does that mean universities like Kyushu Institute of Technology are considered less competent, even if they are one of the leading authorities on robotics? Or how many people will actually considering going to Yonsei University or KAIST in South Korea?
I say it's all relative. It's an option for people who can afford to choose where they want to go. For people who don't really have a choice to go, these ranking are almost irrevelant. However, being comfortable in a university doesn't mean that you can't be better off elsewhere. It's just that it's not an option.