N nicsnaps New Member Dec 14, 2007 23 0 0 Dec 27, 2007 #1 Interesting if this pans out http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1030&thread=26169409 http://www.photozone.de/active/forum/ShowMessage?ID=1093622A
Interesting if this pans out http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1030&thread=26169409 http://www.photozone.de/active/forum/ShowMessage?ID=1093622A
T TMC Senior Member Sep 4, 2004 6,320 0 0 Beyond Space-Time Continuum Dec 27, 2007 #2 The picture in DPreview looks faked. the lens looked distorted.
chanjyj New Member Apr 8, 2007 1,909 0 0 Dec 27, 2007 #3 It looks like a 18-200mm lens. Note the mon-existant space between the end of the S at AF-S and the N of the Nikkor
It looks like a 18-200mm lens. Note the mon-existant space between the end of the S at AF-S and the N of the Nikkor
P psychobiologist Senior Member Mar 13, 2007 2,248 0 0 Atlanta, GA Dec 27, 2007 #4 http://www.pantip.com/cafe/camera/topic/O6165353/O6165353.html
T TMC Senior Member Sep 4, 2004 6,320 0 0 Beyond Space-Time Continuum Dec 27, 2007 #5 its a blardy 24-85 PSed to look differently.
W wildstallion Senior Member Dec 20, 2005 2,836 0 0 Clementi, Singapore www.elliotwestacott.com Dec 27, 2007 #6 No chance, 85 f5.6, haha, its laughable!
Z zenman49 Member Nov 11, 2004 325 0 16 CCK Dec 28, 2007 #8 i think or i hope it's true.... its a better choice for me (wider than 18mm), rather than getting the xpensive 18-200vr.
i think or i hope it's true.... its a better choice for me (wider than 18mm), rather than getting the xpensive 18-200vr.
B blackdrakes New Member Sep 26, 2007 760 0 0 sg Dec 28, 2007 #9 i think if it's going to be true, it will also cost around $600.
