The first shot is darker...moodier.
The second shot, in it's brighter existance, reveals more of the model's shortcomings, making the shot more unappealling.
One can't force a viewer into a close scrutiny via means of such an intimate perspective without paying attention to the undeniable flaws.
If it's going to be a 'glam' shot, you'll need a model that can carry it off...if it's going to be an 'au naturel' - let's appreciate all the flaws for flaws can be beautiful shot, then i would have chosen a plainer (non-glam) model, make-up etc...
Also, wayang eye make-up belongs exactly there: at a wayang.
Ask yourself, "what is it...beyond technicalities...that you wanted to communicate?"
No offence, but the truth has been know to offend...I can't begin to imagine what the poor model must be feling if she is privy to these discussions.
Sorry for the harshness...look beyond the emotions me8.