LTM or M-mount on m4/3


gohaj

Senior Member
Nov 9, 2005
3,805
0
0
I believe several people have tried out LTM or M-mount on m4/3.
Show us some of your photos.;)
 

using Voigtlander Nokton 50mm/f1.1 on m4/3
 

using Voigtlander Nokton 50mm/f1.1 on m4/3
 

4122005636_e48f0555a9_b.jpg


Nokton 50 1.1

4160275888_396f75b894_b.jpg


summicron DR

Hi guys, so far my attempts have been quite successful, just hard to focus with live view
 

using Voigtlander Nokton 50mm/f1.1 on m4/3
 

Hi guys, so far my attempts have been quite successful, just hard to focus with live view

ha... yes I agree. A bit difficult to focus with live view especially using f/1.1 lens.
 

using Voigtlander Nokton 50mm/f1.1 on m4/3
 

Using CV 35f1.4SC on my G1, focusing is easy with the built in EVF no need magnification function.

Mostly shot wide open if not at f2

4324688479_b7a8672b53_o.jpg


more pics here
 

using Voigtlander Nokton 50mm/f1.1 on m4/3



 

This shot i like the feel

4426568673_d5a0ff5f8b_o.jpg
 

using Voigtlander Nokton 50mm/f1.1 on m4/3
 

using Fujinon 50mm/f2 on m4/3
 

using Fujinon 50mm/f2 on m4/3
 

My observation: for M lenses, standard and tele generally work fine on m4/3. 28mm or shorter, you start to see significant drop in image quality, esp. at the edges. (35mm is probably at the border line.) Most WA RF lenses show "smear" image at corners. One good example is the ZM 25mm. Great WA lens on films, but performs poorly on m43. Likewise for Leica 28mm f2 and f2.8 ASPH. [These WA lenses work just fine on digital M though. I believe this has something to do with the different sensors' orientation of these two systems.]

So, m43 is great for short tele, no so for standard nor WA. (One would need a great 25mm f1 lens to get an equivalent 50mm f2 lens on m43, so even the super-expensive Leica 24mm/1.4 summilux is not enough.)

milaurie
 

Last edited: