The TC - Is it worth it? - Well, if you ask me, the answer is Yes and No.
Firstly, no because it is so very small, light with a mere 5 elements in it and looks rather insignificant. This is so if you compare it with an entry level Sigma 70-300F4.5-5.6 Macro Super, which cost a mere 40bucks more. That lens can zoom all the way from 70 to 300, a 4x zoom to boot. This reminds me of the folklore in some North African countries like Algeria and Morocco where the dowry of a bride is based on her weight - that is to say, the heavier she is , the more dowry her parent would get. So, they would feed the gals with lots of fatty mutton just before the marriage. And they say that the men there prefer gal who are well endowed in the weight department. Now, dunno if this is a true, real, genuine, authentic custom there or just that someone made up this story. And if you compare the amount of material in producing the TC and the effort in manufacturing, packaging and transporting it, well, you draw you own conclusion la.
Then, yes, the fact that you could extend or multiply the focal length of you lens by a significant 1.4x. To get that focal length, you would have to fork out big bucks if you were to get that kind of lens. And not forgetting the weight, length to deal with. As for PQ, it is generally known that the 1.4x TC could cause only a slight insignificant drop in PQ.
Why didn't I get this TC rightaway? - well, when I first bought the Sg100-300, I was like still not that confident in able to shoot properly or rather able to handle that kind of long lens and if a TC would make things worst off.
Let me elaborate - 300mm is already like 450mm with the 1.5crop factor. So, not that easy to shoot. With a TC, it would be all the way to a whopping 620mm, which is in super tele territory liao. Moreover, you loose a stop, starting from F5.6. So, ended up you got to use much higher shutter speed and as a result, higher ISO.......
Now, just thinking aloud, I was at one time wondering if I were better off go without the TC and crop more aggressively, rather than handling the difficult shooting situation. During the PLAB open house, I manage to get pretty decent pictures of the RSAF F16 in the sky. My point is that under practical conditions like shooting a flying fighter jet, would I get the shot without the TC as I have done. Not sure if I would get better PQ with the TC. At Paya Lebar, I was able to use fast shutter speed in the tune of 1/800 - 1/1000s or even faster and an aperture of F8 or so without having to go for high ISO. BTW, the action was so very fast that it was too cumbersome and slow to use a tripod or even a monopod.
So, finally, I decided to have a go at it and see for myself how well I am able to cope with the shooting. Also, got to see also, how much PQ I loose with this TC.