Hi, I am very new to DSLR, have only a 300D, and will like to seek advice on the above question.
Is a good lens more important or a good body more important for picture quality?
Eg. If MP count is not important and only printing 8R max, compare Canon 300D+L lens versus 20D+consumer lens, which will give better picture? Is this a good example or should use other comparison?
Also, is there such thing as a DSLR body is too lousy for a L lens, so fixing an L lens does not give much improvement to the picture quality due to the body not good enough? Like is fixing L lens to 300D considered an overkill?
Appreciate all the experienced photographers here can give newbie advise, and please don't flame me if this is a stupid question. Thanks.
Is a good lens more important or a good body more important for picture quality?
Eg. If MP count is not important and only printing 8R max, compare Canon 300D+L lens versus 20D+consumer lens, which will give better picture? Is this a good example or should use other comparison?
Also, is there such thing as a DSLR body is too lousy for a L lens, so fixing an L lens does not give much improvement to the picture quality due to the body not good enough? Like is fixing L lens to 300D considered an overkill?
Appreciate all the experienced photographers here can give newbie advise, and please don't flame me if this is a stupid question. Thanks.