I am a bit confused by some of the magazine reviews...and the website reviews. Sometimes based on the features, they rate the camera good...especially if the camera has RAW.
Checked two magazines from overseas...digital photography...it gave this camera such a low rating of 64% !!!! (The same magazine gave Canon 1d-mark III 94% rating; even the canon compact had a higher rating, around 80+). Another magazine gave this FZ18 a 94% !!! I am not sure which review to believe....the reason I believe is because of noise above ISO 400 (but then all the cameras reviewed had this problem even DSLRs, but FZ18 was singled out for noise ), time taken to focus (I checked and found that all high zoom cameras, the canon [12x], fuji [8000fd], olympus [sp550], panasonic [fz18] were reported to have this same issue especially in telezoom mode, but as always one camera was singled out as poor), .....
Have also read dpreviews, and others. Conflicting reviews as well.....