Just finished reading this article by ken rockwell.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/full-frame-advantage.htm
In it, he mentioned that a full frame DSLR with el cheapo lens will produce better image quality compared to an APS-C DSLR with pro lens (pictures taken with same FOV).
I always thought its the other way round, since APS-C will utilise the sweet center spots, whereas FF will use up the whole lens, thus any flaws in the lens will be more noticeable.
Anyone done any tests before?
PS: Im just discussing about the technical aspects of cameras and lenses, this has nothing to do with photography skills etc
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/full-frame-advantage.htm
In it, he mentioned that a full frame DSLR with el cheapo lens will produce better image quality compared to an APS-C DSLR with pro lens (pictures taken with same FOV).
I always thought its the other way round, since APS-C will utilise the sweet center spots, whereas FF will use up the whole lens, thus any flaws in the lens will be more noticeable.
Anyone done any tests before?
PS: Im just discussing about the technical aspects of cameras and lenses, this has nothing to do with photography skills etc