Originally posted by CYRN
I prefer digital cuz..I like to experiment with my shots...
But a big plus for digital is that I can keep all in a PC nicely sorted in respective folders and the ability for the OS to view the thumbnails.
Lastly I took the digital route, cuz I can post it on the net instantly...or post in forums like CS for others to comment and improve my photographic skills.
Cost aside, it's the matter of what you want out of the equipment you own.... no point having an F1 on the roads of Sg, a nice toyota will do.
So try not to compare FM2 to 1Ds (plus whatever setup needed). Cuz most ppl develops no bigger than 4R normally, a 2-4Mp digicam will suffice... cost wise it's still very affordable.
It's those "prosumers" that have the headachs. Imagine that you take a full screen view of your digitized photo...it's roughly equivilant to an 8R... then ppl start to nickpick about resol and pic quality and digital processes.
The pros does not have this problem cuz they juz use the most suitable equipments that can earn them $$$... they treat their equipments as investments.
That being said, I do have my gripes on digital photography....
Battery life, HDD crash, corrupted files..etc.