70-200F4L...why? Because its the only canon L lens I can afford. :bsmilie:
I love my Tamron SP 28-105mm f2.8. Very good IQ, versatile, built/looks like a tank and is extremely rare. A close second is my Sony 50mm f1.4.
on my EOS FF, I love my Zeiss ZE Planar T* 50mm f1.4 as well as Summicron R 50mm F2...
i haven tried the ZE version but the contax version fares quite well on my FF too.
hey, i ve been looking around for that lens. how does it fare? decent enough at 105mm?
hey, i ve been looking around for that lens. how does it fare? decent enough at 105mm?
for me it's the tammy 28-75
i've just return from my HK trip, you can find that lens in mongkok area that sell 2nd hand camera stuff, infact i found quite some shops selling this one for the average price of HKD3100, originally i plan to get this one instead of the 28-75(coz of the extra reach and the same apature and not so diff price ) but the 3 copies that i tried(at different shops) turns out to be a bit soft wideopen(looks like my old sigma 24-70 picture) to my likings so i just get the tamy 28-75 and very happy with it, hope this helps
willdoang is right. 28-75mm beats it in the sharpness department--but the softness is very manageable and of course, it gets sharper stopped down. It's actually not really noticeable until you compare it to 28-75mm. What I like about the lens is it's toughly built, very fast, the zoom range is perfect, the colors are fantastic, and I'm one of the special few who has it. Downsides are prominent CA (but disappears when stopped down), it's ridiculously big and it takes 82mm filters so you have to shell out a bit more for those.:cry:
VOIGTLANDER Nokton 25mm f/0.95 lens :bigeyes: I am waiting...