DX bro!!Nikon AF55-200mm f4-5.6 NON VR :thumbsup:
one lens to rule them all; cult status
Need FX suggestion.
DX bro!!Nikon AF55-200mm f4-5.6 NON VR :thumbsup:
one lens to rule them all; cult status
why you want to use DX mode if you are getting a FX camera?Oh! Sorry.
Thot can use DX mode too.
But I agree this range limited on FX.
Tamron 28-75 f2.8 is light and good.
yes. i only have dx lens. in fact, only the cult AF55-200mm f4-5.6 NON VR :thumbsup:
TS didn't mention she/he wants only a FX lens ... so I suggest 'the cult'
get the 70-200VR and a very big, comfy bag.
put everything in and hike around singapore for 4 weekends. after that you should be used to the weight already...
or else, juz get the 70-300 VR. i seen many pple using that on FF.
If you intend to only use 1 lens for DSLR, i think a PNS is better.
If you intend to only use 1 lens for DSLR, i think a PNS is better.
i do agree that an entry level DSLR with a prime lens would be better than a PnS camera.. maybe except for the LX3 or G10...I respectfully disagree, a DSLR has much more control than a PnS.
A DSLRwith one lens is a middle ground between the full hog of DSLR stuffs and a PNS. For me, I bring a D100 +18-200 for travel, and leave the D3 with the F2.8s at home. When I'm going to places without much photography (e.g. in HK when I go for shopping), I only bring a Ixus 80.
All depends on your needs.
Thank you all for your suggestions. Looked online photo samples at most of your leads, think the Nikkor 28-105 f3.6-4.5 and the Tamron 24-135 f3.5-5.6 IQs are pretty good. The Tamron AF 18-270 f3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspheric range is enticing, read it has some AF issues at the long range. Appreciate if someone who has used this lens could comment on IQ & AF .
my cousin has this lens. he seems pretty pleased with it. i think most megazooms suffer in their IQ.
f6.3 is kinda limiting, but still AF on mine. dx body.
is the 18-270mm a fx lens? i thought only the 28-300mm.