heehee, no $$ no talk, I wish but I can't:cry: unless you sponsor hor?:bsmilie:Originally posted by ckiang
I'd say F80, but do try out both and see which you prefer.
Regards
CK
Originally posted by 007
heehee, no $$ no talk, I wish but I can't:cry: unless you sponsor hor?:bsmilie:
Originally posted by Kho King
He means trying out both at shop, then decide which one you prefer.
Originally posted by ckiang
Yeah. That's right. Who would want to buy 2 different systems unless one of them is a Leica or something? ;p
Regards
CK
Originally posted by andre
Minolta Dynax 5... price of F65, but with F80 feature...
got more money go for Dynax 7...
hehehe
-Andre
Originally posted by 007
I read somewhere:
Olympus = Good body
Nikon makes good lenses
Canon is somewhere in between.
but personally I like the way canon does business. Nikon is just too stubborn(means no interraction with their customers....and many things only Canon first introduce for quite long, then nikon will use that technology in their cameras.....) other than that it is quite difficult to decide.....Nikon or Canon?:dent:
Originally posted by 007
I read somewhere:
Olympus = Good body
Nikon makes good lenses
Canon is somewhere in between.
Originally posted by Jed
Ruey Loon's post made me think of something a bit differently from the way I normally do. You guys know how I'm always going on about Singaporean photographers being, in general, somewhat too obsessed with equipment? And how in general the people here take better pictures with far, far less equipment? Well, after reading RL's post, I sort of realise that maybe with some people the joy of photography is in using the equipment, and therefore I suppose bells and whistles are a great joy.
For me anyway, my images are all that matter to me, hence equipment envy, comparing brands with passion, comparing brands with ignorance/half truths, all seem a bit stupid.
Originally posted by Jed
Ruey Loon's post made me think of something a bit differently from the way I normally do. You guys know how I'm always going on about Singaporean photographers being, in general, somewhat too obsessed with equipment? And how in general the people here take better pictures with far, far less equipment? Well, after reading RL's post, I sort of realise that maybe with some people the joy of photography is in using the equipment, and therefore I suppose bells and whistles are a great joy.
For me anyway, my images are all that matter to me, hence equipment envy, comparing brands with passion, comparing brands with ignorance/half truths, all seem a bit stupid.
Originally posted by Jed
Ruey Loon's post made me think of something a bit differently from the way I normally do. You guys know how I'm always going on about Singaporean photographers being, in general, somewhat too obsessed with equipment? And how in general the people here take better pictures with far, far less equipment? Well, after reading RL's post, I sort of realise that maybe with some people the joy of photography is in using the equipment, and therefore I suppose bells and whistles are a great joy.
For me anyway, my images are all that matter to me, hence equipment envy, comparing brands with passion, comparing brands with ignorance/half truths, all seem a bit stupid.
Originally posted by crazyhorse
You say that images are all that matter to you, and that all this equipment envy seems a little stupid, yet you can argue so passionately about how useful USM/SSM is to a photographer, and to the extent that you even made a few long posts. And now you can still say that all this equipment discussions seem a little stupid to you. Makes me wonder if whatever you're saying is credible......
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3459&perpage=20&pagenumber=2
Originally posted by Jed
Ruey Loon's post made me think of something a bit differently from the way I normally do. You guys know how I'm always going on about Singaporean photographers being, in general, somewhat too obsessed with equipment? And how in general the people here take better pictures with far, far less equipment? Well, after reading RL's post, I sort of realise that maybe with some people the joy of photography is in using the equipment, and therefore I suppose bells and whistles are a great joy.
For me anyway, my images are all that matter to me, hence equipment envy, comparing brands with passion, comparing brands with ignorance/half truths, all seem a bit stupid.
Originally posted by crazyhorse
You say that images are all that matter to you, and that all this equipment envy seems a little stupid, yet you can argue so passionately about how useful USM/SSM is to a photographer, and to the extent that you even made a few long posts. And now you can still say that all this equipment discussions seem a little stupid to you. Makes me wonder if whatever you're saying is credible......
Originally posted by crazyhorse
You say that images are all that matter to you, and that all this equipment envy seems a little stupid, yet you can argue so passionately about how useful USM/SSM is to a photographer, and to the extent that you even made a few long posts. And now you can still say that all this equipment discussions seem a little stupid to you. Makes me wonder if whatever you're saying is credible......