100% crop at low ISO will still be visibly different actually. For prints, at low ISO will be close for 8R. For 4R doubt you would see a difference. At higher ISO naturally APS-C has the edge. Though with a good noise reduction program most modem day prosumers can hold their own reasonably well.
Depends on how you define superzoom compact wor. Some small small cameras have same or marginally close sensor size as APS-C. Heck, some of those small cameras come in 35mm! (Im talking about range finders)
Depends on how you define superzoom compact wor. Some small small cameras have same or marginally close sensor size as APS-C. Heck, some of those small cameras come in 35mm! (Im talking about range finders)
Due to cost constraints and compromises made due to zoom range the zoom lenses of compact cams don't have the same quality as similar lenses for DSLR. Compact cams have an expected life span of maybe 2 years or less, then the next model is out and the maker expects consumers to buy it. A lens for DSLR can serve many years, the efforts put into design and manufacturing are much higher. The result is a better picture quality.
Wa. This question need calculator...and im kinda lazy. However...
I believe the image from the DSLR is going to suffer very badly.
Because the lumix sensor is really very small compared to an APS-C. That means you're gonna crop out a hell lot from it end up with a very pixelated image.