A few photos from SMU
- Thread starter YSLee
- Start date
- Status
It was directed at a sexist comment in the first place.Originally posted by Daniel
Now that's a sexist comment, feminist groups will haul you in for it. Why do you have to associate photographs of beautiful women with pornographic material?
Oppsmade a moderator angry, pls pls dun delete me ok??
ok ok..let's not argue alright.Originally posted by Daniel
Thot SMU got a lot of chio bu's
What you portrayed was a ghost town!
Com'on this is Street/Candid Photography Forum
Not Landscape Photography Forum
In my opinion, i think what he meant was the pretty gals that we all see on the streets. Not the porno posers..........
According to the Webster Dictionary, the definition of sexism is:
sex·ism (skszm)
n.
Discrimination based on gender, especially discrimination against women.
Attitudes, conditions, or behaviors that promote stereotyping of social roles based on gender.
I believe calling someone beautiful hardly qualifies as a discrimination to women or in effect be called a sexist comment
Can't say the same with associating beautiful women with pornography!
I stand by my words, there's nothing sexist about called a woman beautiful. Anyway beauty is not a quality exclusive to females only. Man and things can also be objects of beauty. Hence a comment about beauty cannot be a specific target to a particular sex only.
But your comment about
If you want to see females, perhaps you should go to a porno site instead of ClubSNAP is obviously targeted as a sterotypical comment against females.
I rest my case.
But your comment about
If you want to see females, perhaps you should go to a porno site instead of ClubSNAP is obviously targeted as a sterotypical comment against females.
I rest my case.
- Status