75-300mm lens

[ballwackers]

There are a two different lenses being mentioned here... the 70-300, the 75-300. They are different in price and quality. Here are two reports from the same source:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-300mm-f-4-5.6-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-75-300mm-f-4-5.6-III-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

 

[diver-hloc]

I figure maybe can sell the lens later for $150 den get the 55-250 IS lor...u guys think it's logical?

Not a bad idea..... :thumbsup:

Except that this lens have such a record that most wouldn't pay $150 for it :bsmilie: But you could always try !!

BTW..... my very old EF 75-300mm non USM is still growing mould somewhere under my bed :bigeyes:

 

[dev2k8]

Try lor "bo he hei ma ho" hahaha!!! Even no buyer oso $59 worth it. The exposure I gain to long zoom photography is more den enough.

 

[billycadiz]

Thanks dev2k8, next time I'll go check that ritual of them, interesting, thanks for sharing.

 

[69eFaN69]

i too got this lens. kinda fun to play around with. to me its alright at $59, not at $300 haha.

Here are some zoomd shots taken from a moving car..

cheers.

 

[Goldenstars08]

i too got this lens. kinda fun to play around with. to me its alright at $59, not at $300 haha.

Here are some zoomd shots taken from a moving car..

cheers.

The sharpness of this photos look good.
To all: If you use this lens at F/8 or even F/11, the pic can be reasonably sharp...