No LCD display, even in those digicams that's supposed to be WYSIWYG, I have used before ever produce exactly what was eventually rendered and even what was rendered was not the best that they could be and always needed post-processing. What's worse is that with most DSLRs, what's displayed when reviewing the shots taken is not the same as what's recorded by the camera. Usually what's recorded is worse than what's displayed on the LCD giving me the wrong impression that the shot was OK and need not be retaken. It is a general advice that we can't use the LCD display to judge the accuracy of colours and the real image quality.
So it doesn't bother me one bit that the colours on the LCD are not actually what I wanted them to be finally. Would be nice if they were though.
This would be the first time any user ever complained about the Olympus colours which is usually one of the reasons why most people switched to Olympus in the first place. That shot of your daughter looks very good to me. You mean it is not taken with the E-330?
The 14-45mm lens does have a tendency to exhibit perspective distortion at the wide end but not in the tele end. Then again, at some of the angles that I have seen in your images, I would be surprised if there was no perspective distortion in the first place.:dunno:
The 14-45mm is reputedly the best kit lens of any brand of entry-level DSLRs. It is not as good as the 14-54mm (the kit lens of the E1) of course but better than most consumer grade Canon lenses I have used so far. However, most people who are used to the default sharpness of a P&S digicam might find the default sharpness of any DSLR to be rather soft. If that's the case with you, just increase the sharpness in the camera setting if you are shooting jpeg and during RAW processing if shooting RAW. Then again, I thought you do have a DSLR before the E-330. I'm a stickler for sharpness myself and always use a macro lens with both my 20D and E-330 for the close-ups and portraits. As a result of which, the ZD 50mm or 35mm macro is almost always on my E-330 full time.
I would agree with you that 3 AF points are insufficient and are too close for those who like to shoot with off-centred AF points. I prefer to shoot only with the centre AF point and find it faster to use AFL and recompose if I want to focus on subjects that's are located off-centred, in which case you might say that for me 1 AF point would be enough.
For long exposure shots, I hope you have turned on Noise Reduction (pg 87 of the Advanced Manual). I have yet to come across a camera that comes with a manual that's as detailed as I would want it to be but the Advanced Manual that comes with the E-330 is better than most at 197 pages and an Acrobat file size of >20M.
The battery is not as bad as that. I have shot for more than a day with a fully charged battery on Live-View and flash when I was on vacations overseas without much problem. A brand new fully drained rechargeable battery does not reach full capacity on the first charge. It only does so after a few full discharge/recharge cycles. This is not peculiar to the Lithium-ion battery used by the E-330 but is the basic characteristic of all rechargeable batteries. If after a few cycles, you are still getting too few shots out of it, then you might have a 'lemon' battery. In any case, you can get third party spare batteries with higher capacities at about $35 or so each for the E-330, something you can't do with any Sony digicam, R1 included.