Do you mean that 10-22 has less distortion compared to 16-35 or 17-40 on a full frame:think:
****17-55 f/2.8 IS vs 24-105 f/4 L IS**** REALLY NEED HELP!
- Thread starter BePositive
- Start date
- Status
Do you mean that 10-22 has less distortion compared to 16-35 or 17-40 on a full frame:think:
Hi,
I wonder if the owner of this topic has found his answer because somehow I'm looking for the answer to the same question.
I got Canon 350D body with Tokina 12-24mm F4, Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 and 70-200mm F4.
I'm planning to sell my Tamron 17-50mm, thus it theotically leaves the range from 24mm to 70mm to be filled up (Canon 24-70mm 2.8 is out of question though).
Thus, I'm considering two lenses:
1) Canon EF-S 17-55mm F2.8
2) Canon EF 24-105 F4 L
My usual shooting style is landscape, streets and portrait photos.
The 17-55mm 2.8 would make a good combo with my 70-200F4, but I learnt from my experience with Tamron lens that changing lens is a damn in some situation.
If I go for 24-105, it would make a good combo with my Tokina and I don't have to change lens so often. However I worry about in some lowlight shooting conditions such as indoor dinners (not my usual shooting style) but sometimes needed.
Would the 24-105 survive in such cases?
I wonder if the owner of this topic has found his answer because somehow I'm looking for the answer to the same question.
I got Canon 350D body with Tokina 12-24mm F4, Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 and 70-200mm F4.
I'm planning to sell my Tamron 17-50mm, thus it theotically leaves the range from 24mm to 70mm to be filled up (Canon 24-70mm 2.8 is out of question though).
Thus, I'm considering two lenses:
1) Canon EF-S 17-55mm F2.8
2) Canon EF 24-105 F4 L
My usual shooting style is landscape, streets and portrait photos.
The 17-55mm 2.8 would make a good combo with my 70-200F4, but I learnt from my experience with Tamron lens that changing lens is a damn in some situation.
If I go for 24-105, it would make a good combo with my Tokina and I don't have to change lens so often. However I worry about in some lowlight shooting conditions such as indoor dinners (not my usual shooting style) but sometimes needed.
Would the 24-105 survive in such cases?
i'm in the same sitation!
recently rented the 24-105L. excellent day lens! damn sold and bokeh is nice. however, without my 580EX, it lacks in lowlight dinner pics.
perhaps the 17-55 will be a better option if you're not an ass for build quality, full frame capability in future.
He he
sorry guys
I was still confused till last Sunday so I did not post anything (I got most of the info I needed, so spent time thinking )
Finally, I think I will go for the 24-105 as I found out I did not shoot very wide. Besides, the 17-55 is not really flexible for me (I want to get a 5D in near future). And lastly, "L lens" factor:lovegrin:
If anyone got the same problem as me, maybe might want to buy the 24-105 too
sorry guysI was still confused till last Sunday so I did not post anything (I got most of the info I needed, so spent time thinking
)Finally, I think I will go for the 24-105 as I found out I did not shoot very wide. Besides, the 17-55 is not really flexible for me (I want to get a 5D in near future). And lastly, "L lens" factor:lovegrin:
If anyone got the same problem as me, maybe might want to buy the 24-105 too
He he
I was still confused till last Sunday so I did not post anything (I got most of the info I needed, so spent time thinking)
Finally, I think I will go for the 24-105 as I found out I did not shoot very wide. Besides, the 17-55 is not really flexible for me (I want to get a 5D in near future). And lastly, "L lens" factor:lovegrin:
If anyone got the same problem as me, maybe might want to buy the 24-105 too
Great decision!! Right on :sweatsm: 24-105 is a beautiful lens and can reach into 105mm compare to 55mm.. But you may need a wider lens to compensate the wide end :bsmilie: i.e. 10-22 (But well.. even if you have 17-55, you still need 10-22 IMO)
Bokeh handling capability? Curvation DOF? Sorry, I need you to elaborate on these. I don't get what you mean. What is unsatisfactory?
curvature dof. a problem mentioned here: http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/tamron_1750_28/index.htm
I know what it is, but it is an unavoidable side effect of quite a lot of lenses that are as wide as 18 or 17mm.
yeah.. now it is cheaper.. when I am deciding mine.. 24-105 is about $1980 and 24-70 is about $2100 :embrass:
- Status
Similar threads
