Dear bros,
I have a question
If I use 16-85mm and zoom it to 35mm
F2.8
The effect and technical aspect will it be the same as I use 35mm prime lenses f2.8 ?
fatBozZ said:Dear bros,
I have a question
If I use 16-85mm and zoom it to 35mm
F2.8
The effect and technical aspect will it be the same as I use 35mm prime lenses f2.8 ?
I think it 2 lens nothing to compare, maybe u only zoom to 35mm and compare to 35mm f1.8 vs f4.5. That is what you want.
For me both I'll need, cause in 35mm f1.8 can be used as low light environment.
When in the wide angle I lost of 16mm in DX format.
That why my answer pls grab both.
Thanks
Rashkae said:He's specifically talking about both at 35mm f/2.8 - no need to confuse the issues with f/4, f/1.8, etc. It's a simple "what if" question.
But the 16-85mm f stop only offer at f3.5-5.6 where got f2.8?
Rashkae said:Well, I never said it was realistic.
But, in pure theory, if you have a zoom and set it to the same focal length as a prime, and set to the same aperture, you will get a similar image (quality of blur aside).
It's for him to discover if his lens can actually do it.
If the zoom lens stop 1 or 2 stop down the aperture you may get more blur image.
Rashkae said:Actually less blur - stopping down the aperture means you are closing the aperture, thus increasing DOF.
But on the 16-85 built-in VR just shoot with VR for help in smaller aperture if needed sharper image.
The only lost with out of focus blur.
Rashkae said:VR will help with handshake, but not with motion blur. VR is not a cure-all.
Also, it will depend on what you are trying to shoot - if a small aperture will spoil the desired effect, then you would not use it.
rain5533 said:That why can't compare from both
Just refer here for sample compared.
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/newbies-corner/1089511-nikon-micro-normal-lens-2.html
Hi, here my latest update on actual photos reviews.
Just find up the bigger different from this 2 lens.
Thanks
rhino123 said:Which only go to show that at the same aperture, the degree of blur is suppose to be the same. However if you look at the out-of-focus point of light, there is some difference between the two...
and that proof what I have been preaching in both my post. Degree of blur is the same, quality of blur might be different... it all depend on the construction of the lens, the number of blades, the shape of the blades and so on and so fore.
If you wanna finding the good to compare sharpness will go for zoom lens.
Some here :
If wide open you may get more CA on white object.