that why becareful of posting photos online, always watermarked it well, u jus dunno where it goes.
as for the photo.. it was very well taken.
as for the photo.. it was very well taken.
14 y/o girl's photo illegally posted on porn DVD
- Thread starter nikontiger
- Start date
- Status
'as it goes to paedophile website'? Disregarding the obvious problems with syntax.. LOL. The atmosphere in today's society is so insanely sick it's sad. You may **** to pictures of naked toddlers, but the vast majority of people take pictures like that to capture the innocence and/or vulnerability of children at that age, and NOT in the sexual way either. Hell, I've had a picture of me nude at 3-5 (or something like that) placed on the cover-page of a mothering-related magazine, and it certainly didn't raise the ire of parents or cries of 'preteen pornography!'. Just because the way you think is twisted doesn't make something actually twisted.
A case of superuser overusing their super powers... Seems that our superusers are always banning this and that nowdays....
Actually, I've been watching her on DA for a long time..
Apparently, her account even got hacked b4, and I've not heard of any other photographer's (on DA) facing the same prob.
Well. What can I say? Most of her portraits are self-portraits. She posts them up. She's watched by alot of pple. And because of that, she might appear to be arrogant? (Not for me to decide, but that's quite a common trend there with deviants with high page view..)
So... she's responsible for her own actions. Not that she was wrong by posting or anything. But has to be aware of consequences.
(And it's no wonder she don't post much nowdays..) :think:
Oh, she's already way past 14. Lol.
Apparently, her account even got hacked b4, and I've not heard of any other photographer's (on DA) facing the same prob.
Well. What can I say? Most of her portraits are self-portraits. She posts them up. She's watched by alot of pple. And because of that, she might appear to be arrogant? (Not for me to decide, but that's quite a common trend there with deviants with high page view..)
So... she's responsible for her own actions. Not that she was wrong by posting or anything. But has to be aware of consequences.
(And it's no wonder she don't post much nowdays..) :think:
Oh, she's already way past 14. Lol.
Haha, I hope your zodiac sign is not an Ostrich, it doesn't exist.
There's a real world out there where children are exposed to "dangers" that we all can't stop. If minors can come into CS to read this thread, what makes you think they won't open another window of porno stuff? You're a little naive, isn't it? But we sure can help out by raising awareness anyway we can, then the parents and school will have to educate them.Haha, no worries, nobody has perfect understanding of situations and english, not even superusers. I don't think the name super is a title, its just a website seniority thingy, certainly doesn't qualify or prove the ability of the user...IMHO
haha ... i am confused too.... 1,500 and 3,500s already Superusers!:dunno: i thought at least 10k...:think: or maybe they really have superpower.
Sorry, pls educate this newbird (not ostrich) , what are 1,500 and 3,500 referring to? Monthly income? :bsmilie:
It's so sad to see this kind of infringement, especially one of a girl who had her photo posted on a porno dvd...
Haiz, imagine if you are walking down the street, and some hustler comes walking up to you on a big bustling road and says, "Aren't you that girl on the porno dvd cover? Wanna !@)(# ?"
:cry:
If I'm in her shoes, I'd feel so shocked and shamed. How to face the world like that? :cry:
On the site with the original picture, I saw that the watermark is placed at a spot (the dress of the character) and that is easily rubberstamped/cloned away in PS.
'nuff said.
I guess with this thread (OT talks aside) we all have new, additional bit of inner-understanding about weighing in your options of whether or not to put your albums online to share with others. And if you do, how are you going to ensure that your interests are being protected if you are concerned about it...
Haiz, imagine if you are walking down the street, and some hustler comes walking up to you on a big bustling road and says, "Aren't you that girl on the porno dvd cover? Wanna !@)(# ?"
:cry: If I'm in her shoes, I'd feel so shocked and shamed. How to face the world like that? :cry:
On the site with the original picture, I saw that the watermark is placed at a spot (the dress of the character) and that is easily rubberstamped/cloned away in PS.
'nuff said.
I guess with this thread (OT talks aside) we all have new, additional bit of inner-understanding about weighing in your options of whether or not to put your albums online to share with others. And if you do, how are you going to ensure that your interests are being protected if you are concerned about it...
And it seems that porno boss knows that he's so going to get away with it - the reply in bold by him is so mean!
:cry:
There's no way an ordinary person can fork out 50000 to get a lawyer. Swallowing down this on-going humiliation is really... "ugh-ness"
Really... Haiz... I hope some Samaritan or a lawyer sees it and volunteers himself. But then again, there must be so many of these things happening around the world, and women and children alike are being exploited in this way, or worse... haiz, so depressing to think about.
:cry:
There's no way an ordinary person can fork out 50000 to get a lawyer. Swallowing down this on-going humiliation is really... "ugh-ness"
Really... Haiz... I hope some Samaritan or a lawyer sees it and volunteers himself. But then again, there must be so many of these things happening around the world, and women and children alike are being exploited in this way, or worse... haiz, so depressing to think about.
- Status