Search results

anyoneee?

thanks! any one able to recommend a place to do prints then?

hi all! ive got a few prints i'd like to do and frame up for display and i need to find out more about this whole issue. 1. where can i go to get decent digital prints done at around A3 size, apart from the kodac/fujifilm places? 2. lets say i've got an image that's 2048px x 1360px...

thanks! =D yup, point taken. but i didnt have much of a choice. this was taken within st pats.. thanks though!

my apologies. i couldn't think of a better name for it without being cliched.

hey all. it's been a really, really long time since i've posted anything so, here goes. *fingers crossed.* this was taken at APLYC8 (www.aplyc8.org) - a youth congress - in st patrick's school. hope y'all like it! a little shameless publicity: if you like the pic, go check out my...

exactly. thanks dream_merchant! really appreciate the help. :)

i'm using the kit, which is fine for normal use. just that i'd be shooting in low light and covering fast paced activities and the f2.8 would be really useful. im trying to keep my iso as low as possible too.

aww, thanks man! heh.

yeapp. thank's a back up plan i got.. just looking for quicker alternatives.. thanks though!

yeah, forgot to mention. thanks josh!

btw, i don't know if i posted this in the right section so if the mods think it isnt, please feel free to move it to where ever is appropriate.

hi all i'm a J2 student who'd be covering a youth conference on a purely voluntary basis (no pay involved), and i'd need the use of this lens. problem is, it's for a rather long period of time (24th nov to 9th dec) and renting one would be just too pricey. so, if possible (i know it's a...

Bingo. i think night86mare hit the nail on the head. haha.

hey liionel when i saw your shot, i knew it had the potential to look awesome, just that it's missing something here. i cant really put my finger on it. it's like, the feeling i get is that there's something not quite right with it. not much of a help, i know, but i wanted you to know. don't...

i think its underexposed as a whole. composition worked for me and i think the background's okay. and i do have to agree with Yatlapball. that IS a very interesting idea you're trying to put forth and i think you did a great job pulling that off. :)

i think the concept's real interesting and composition is spot on. i wouldnt have composed it any other way. but personally, the fisheye effect didnt work for me. i think its too distracting cause my eyes drifted to the bottom of the image almost immediately. nonetheless, great shot, and...

eh, good point. when i went there i didnt expect the fence. that's why i didnt pay much atention to the position of the fence.. pure oversight on my part i guess. haha, well, old-ER then.

oh, no. i dont meant to over expose it to get it whiter.. i meant to say that the issue here is the shade of white. like, its cream, not white per se. but like i said, im probably just nitpicking cause that's what i see from my screen and i may be wrong.

i don't know man.. this didnt work for me. i personally feel that the background should be whiter (i may be anal on this one, but my screen shows the white to be a lil creamy), no shadows and maybe take this shot at a more dynamic angle? and maybe open it partially to show the crayons inside for...