Hi. Any bros/sis here have used the Tamron AF 18-200MM F/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) on their K-r?
How is the performance of this lens on the K-r?
Thanks!
How is the performance of this lens on the K-r?
Thanks!
Hi. Any bros/sis here have used the Tamron AF 18-200MM F/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) on their K-r?
How is the performance of this lens on the K-r?
Thanks!
Yes 18-135mm's image quality is only passable at best... The greatest strength is the quiet motor, no zoom creep and water resistance.
Also take my comment with a pinch of salt, for I'm only an beginner at best.
Yes 18-135mm's image quality is only passable at best... The greatest strength is the quiet motor, no zoom creep and water resistance.
Also take my comment with a pinch of salt, for I'm only an beginner at best.
Yes 18-135mm's image quality is only passable at best... The greatest strength is the quiet motor, no zoom creep and water resistance.
Also take my comment with a pinch of salt, for I'm only an beginner at best.
pinholecam said:Review of the 18-135 here:
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/threads/884563-Review-of-the-SMC-Pentax-DA-18-135mm-F3.5-5.6-ED-AL-IF-DC-WR?highlight=da+18-135+review
This is really a nice lens. A bit pricey in real money terms but not pricey in terms of value.
Weather sealing (so resistance to dust thrown up by cars/trucks in dusty roads or water thrown at you by the sea or Thai water festival for example, all these are real situations that the lens can be useful in)
The close focus is really good.
The size is almost the size of the 18-55 kit lens. The ease of carrying and lack of encumbrance for a 18-135mm is not what any Tom Dick Harry lens can give (other brands included.
All these either cost money or is worth some added value (eg. ease to bring along).
Image quality is good for this lens. Cannot agree with the 'passable' comment.
The images in the review speaks for themselves.
Actually I bought it becos I read your review and u r using a k-5 but I'm using a k-r.
+1Lol
Use it more.