that will be lovely . . . and the print will be 'Made in Singapore'. :sweatsm:
This will be the best news . . .
Yeahlor...then the crowd has found a true mecca to queue long long in front of the factory... :bsmilie:
that will be lovely . . . and the print will be 'Made in Singapore'. :sweatsm:
This will be the best news . . .
here a tinker for thought...
u hv higher ISO performance, but do u really use it?
cos at low-light or poor lightning situation, the WB is often hard to predict by the cam if u r on Auto.
a easy way out is to use flash, then again the iso is often set to 100 or 200 when u use a flash........
jus for thought...hmmm...
Believe me... if you want to capture true ambient light - good high ISO performance is very important... Even with a powerful 2.8 zoom, you'd still need it. When you're good enough, you'll adjust your own K values to capture the proper WB...
wanted to share another test being done for this D7K. check this out: http://bophot.blogspot.com/2010/10/nikon-d7000-in-d700-kratka-primerjava.html
There were some reports of hot pixels when using video, and seen some samples taken at higher ISO (1600 or above) having that too.
Do you guys think it could be a concern to you?
The fx still has a one stop advantage. wonder if there was a up res or down res of the pics as they are using different number of megapixels...
well...he did mention pic taken at ISO 1600 n above havin the same problem...
no offence intended or taken, but if ppl wan to use dslr to take video, a pns does the job well too.
well...i not a fan of dslr-video.........:devil: