hi guys i am considering getting macro , i am interested in macro thus i am thinking whether i should spend more money in it , and yes i am a beginner.
depends how steady your hands are. I would think the IS is useful for pple like me who have shaky hands. Also the 100L has weather sealing, so if the diff is $300, I would go for the 100L, if I am going to hike and shoot insects. But if you are going to be shooting product shots, it does not matter.
depends how steady your hands are. I would think the IS is useful for pple like me who have shaky hands. Also the 100L has weather sealing, so if the diff is $300, I would go for the 100L, if I am going to hike and shoot insects. But if you are going to be shooting product shots, it does not matter.
if you have the money, why not?
at 300 bucks more... i'll go for 100L... use it before, darn good piece of glass! you will appreciate the better build, better AF speed and IS.
In that case the t90 is also a capable lens
ok man thanks man , i think i have decided to get tamron wish me luck on that one!
if the difference is $300, go for 100L
if u need the lens urgent, go for tamron
if u can wait, go for 100L
if u seldom shoot macro, go for tamron
no need to wish you luck. There is nothing wrong with Tamron lenses. A lens in hand is better than 2 on the shelf. Just do it. I think Sigma also have good macro lenses.