14-24

[chanjyj]

I consider that the user's inability to select the appropriate lens to use. This and coupled with lack of planning and taking photos to hastily and not so much of a problematic lens. Just like people complaing about the perspective distortion UWAs render and saying some lens are better controlled than the others. Its really about the lack of understanding of the lens since perspective distortion is focal length dependent rather than lens design. As with all other lenses, it takes time to master.



Perhaps with the exception of the 14mm, the 14-24 covers focal lengths which are used by many photographers, for many years, in countless situations, covering a vast number of genres. Its hardly a specialised lens. Misunderstood...always but definitely not specialised. Its not like a perspective control lens or a macro lens with magnification which performs other functions. Most probably, those people sold their UWAs way before they even start learning how to use these lenses.

I fully agree. Eloquently put. :thumbsup:

 

[chanjyj]

The light source is at the other end of the room so the shadowed area will always be there regardless of any any editing, unless I use a strobe.

Golly. Kit, sometimes some answers are not worth answering.

 

[HELLOSTEVEN]

hi all

what is the cost for the 14-24 lens
:embrass:

 

[Kit]

Golly. Kit, sometimes some answers are not worth answering.

Its ok. If it can clear up some misconception, its worth responding to.

 

[Kit]

hi all

what is the cost for the 14-24 lens
:embrass:

$2700+

 

[Jed]

$2700+

If you're prepared to buy it second hand you can usually pick one up on these forums for about $2699. $2680 if you're very lucky/patient.

:bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie:

 

[wildcat]

Kit, your shots are :thumbsup:

Agree! Kit's shots are :thumbsup:

 

[wildcat]

If you're prepared to buy it second hand you can usually pick one up on these forums for about $2699. $2680 if you're very lucky/patient.

:bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie:

Huh? These are not Kit lens meh? Sorry.. overused corny joke. I also disturb my friend Prime similarly.

 

[Kit]

Huh? These are not Kit lens meh? Sorry.. overused corny joke. I also disturb my friend Prime similarly.

I have a friend..... his name is Zoom..

 

[mcn]

hi.. i'v just sold my 24-70, and now considering the 14-24..
can anyone having this lens give me a feedbacks on how good this lens are.. images from this lens are appreciated as well.
i realize it will be more easier to google the advantages and reviews of this lens, and i have done so, while the intention of this thread is simply to ensure me and "push" me to buy this lens.. so, feedbacks are extremely welcome.. thx in advance for those who read, and willing to share their thoughts..

i have not this lens but from what i yahooed, it's heavy, optically super, expensive and expansive, more a speciality lens and most who bought and own it swore by it, worshipped it (and will keep it). i am serious.

 

[PixTraveller]

hi all

what is the cost for the 14-24 lens
:embrass:

I got mine in HK for about S$2500 last year; I was quoted $2750 before I went to HK.

Interestingly, when I was in MidValley in KL during CNY and I was quoted about the same price (before negotiations). So you may want to look at the option of buying that lens there.

And yes, it is for a brand new set from an authorised Nikon dealer.

 

[chanjyj]

I consider that the user's inability to select the appropriate lens to use. This and coupled with lack of planning and taking photos to hastily and not so much of a problematic lens. Just like people complaing about the perspective distortion UWAs render and saying some lens are better controlled than the others. Its really about the lack of understanding of the lens since perspective distortion is focal length dependent rather than lens design. As with all other lenses, it takes time to master.

Perhaps with the exception of the 14mm, the 14-24 covers focal lengths which are used by many photographers, for many years, in countless situations, covering a vast number of genres. Its hardly a specialised lens. Misunderstood...always but definitely not specialised. Its not like a perspective control lens or a macro lens with magnification which performs other functions. Most probably, those people sold their UWAs way before they even start learning how to use these lenses.

Well anyway, I do have one unorthodox use for UWAs (cause I am too lazy or rushing for time). I use them for quick panos.

A single photograph, and cropping off the top and bottom. The 'normal' method would be to stitch several photos together. However I find it works fine as long as you do not print wall-sized photos.

"Panorama" from an AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8

 

[Kit]

Well anyway, I do have one unorthodox use for UWAs (cause I am too lazy or rushing for time). I use them for quick panos.

A single photograph, and cropping off the top and bottom. The 'normal' method would be to stitch several photos together. However I find it works fine as long as you do not print wall-sized photos.

Pano from an AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8

Hah!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/arkitecture/sets/72157622938113648/detail/
All cropped too!

 

[HELLOSTEVEN]

thanks.

 

[Benji77]

I didn't see the ''fault'' in the first image till you guys mentioned it.
My personal feel is that its 'there' after post processing (contrast, levels etc).
It does not appear in the other images, even from the other CSer's post.

The light source is at the other end of the room so the shadowed area will always be there regardless of any any editing, unless I use a strobe.

I apologize if I interpreted my post as ''your error in post processing''. My intention was to support the ''shadowed'' area as ''sure to be there'' regardless of the lens or technique.
I see no fault in the error in the shot as quoted by other friendly CSers.

 

[fevernova]

Today marks the 3rd day since I rented my 14-24 to be used on the D700 from "The Camera Rental Centre". Didn't manage to get much mileage out of it as I had night cycling on Friday and slept away half of my Saturday...

So far, things looks more interesting when shot up close.

Also, within more confined spaces, it offers an interesting perspective e.g. Inside a pub or within buildings. Mugshots results in bloated faces and the UWA perspective distortion is interesting. Definitely a lens I've got to think before shooting else things will all look too small and distant. (I'm still new and learning...)

Oh, and for a walk about, its HEAVY! Had to take out my battery grip to lighten the weight....

Here are a couple of random snap shots to test the wideness of the lens as well as the perspective it gives....Btw, sorry for the top right corner vignettes...The angle of view is SO wide that the door frame of the car was caught in it....>.<

Taken in moving vehicle...Wanted to see how going without filters could be a problem in high contrast scenes...But apparently, with a bit of post-processing, its still possible to savage the skies (in this case, it was probably overdone....My bad, pushed the colours a little too hard!)

Done in moving vehicle....VERY WIDE!!!

Nearer to the IR...Yeah, I know, the door was caught in it...

And this was shot in the bar last night...Managed only 1 shot as people were staring at me when I took the camera out....-_-'

 

[iBishop]

there is hardly any distortion, i can’t believe how much i can see through this thing!

 

[fevernova]

there is hardly any distortion, i can’t believe how much i can see through this thing!

You got yourself a copy of this lens?

 

[iBishop]

You got yourself a copy of this lens?

hi fevernova,

i&#8217;d love to be able to own them. i&#8217;m battling with buying the new lens or getting a new imac one day.
u're using a FX sensor aint u?
the perspective is incredible, perhaps u should get it!

 

[fevernova]

hi fevernova,

i’d love to be able to own them. i’m battling with buying the new lens or getting a new imac one day.
u're using a FX sensor aint u?
the perspective is incredible, perhaps u should get it!

Yeah, I'm using the D700...

Anyway, just rent it! I did it and never regretted it...Allows you to have a feel of the lens and its restrictions (e.g. heavy weight, scary naked front elements) and you'll know if its worth the buy....

So far, I like it alot but find it a little too wide for general walk about purposes. Probably the 16-35 would suit be better...