coolpix7900 said:Hi, nice pics there. looks like the lens is quite useful hor. Actually now donno if I should buy a 11-22mm lens or should I buy a flash first. Any comments? :think:
if choose between 11-22 and a flash, i'll go for a flash first. agreed with nightpiper. sometimes, without the flash, you will be handicapped.nightpiper said:actually i vote for the flash. its something quite neccessary as u take pics. the 40-150 is a very versatile lens. good for a lot of things if u know how & what to exploit. :thumbsup:
Looks like all of you have given me a very clear mandate of getting the flash. I was contemplating what I should be getting first for sometime. Thank you all very much, I will be going down now to get the flash today.shchow said:if choose between 11-22 and a flash, i'll go for a flash first. agreed with nightpiper. sometimes, without the flash, you will be handicapped.
while for the ultra-wide angle, you can still try slightly different composition with the 14-45mm you have.
hi, teo, i was using Spot Metering, Aperture Priority, S-AF.Teo said:What is your exposure mode and focus setting for photo #2?
Hi, actually wanted to get the FL-50, but when I see the real thing, I was like , so big piece... hahaha... i'm not really a heavy user so FL-36 should serve me fine right now. Maybe later when I become more "steady" hor, then I can consider the FL-50. Thanks!Benng said:I agree with the rest of you. If I were you, I will get the flash first. 11-22mm you can put on hold first.
I personally will get the FL-50 over the FL-36 in terms of good recycle rate. But the FL-36 is good for travelling cos it is both light and compact in size.
Benng said:I agree with the rest of you. If I were you, I will get the flash first. 11-22mm you can put on hold first.
I personally will get the FL-50 over the FL-36 in terms of good recycle rate. But the FL-36 is good for travelling cos it is both light and compact in size.
hi selamatlzh, is that right? i tot someone has claimed that the FL-50 has further reach and faster recycling rate than the FL-36. that's why i was thinking of upgrading to FL-50 from FL-36.selamatlzh said:BTW if you are not aware. The recycling rate for FL50 and 36 is the same.
selamatlzh said:BTW if you are not aware. The recycling rate for FL50 and 36 is the same.
Benng said:Oh is it? :embrass: I have personally use both FL-36 and FL-50 before and I felt that the FL-50 recycling rate is faster. That was the main reason why I upgraded from FL-36 to FL-50.
I even tried using the Energiser Lithium battery on the FL-36 but the recycling rate is still slower. Probably because it uses 2 x AA batteries instead of 4 x AA batteries for the FL-50.