Actually some reviewers say vc version is not as sharp as motor version.kodakero12 said:For Nikon Mount...Most reviews/ groups say that the first version of Tamron's 17-50 f2.8 is the sharpest over the VC and the built in motor version.
For sharpness sake, would you sell your VC or built in motor version to get the 17-50 without motor?
hey, sorry I'm not very clear about the motor part. can I check, are there 2 non-VC lenses - one with motor and one without? what are the pros/cons for each?Actually some reviewers say vc version is not as sharp as motor version.
But non-motor version performs the same as motor version in IQ. just that the non motor version focuses faster than the motor version.
the current ones sold in shops which are noisy when focusing - they are the motor versions?Daredevil123 just said it.
The non motor version AF faster with a body that can do it compare to the motor version that can AF on any camera body.