tokina plasticky?? are you sure they gave you the right brand? :what:
hmmm maybe the shop show him a Tochina one instead.... knowing some shop.... hmmm...
tokina plasticky?? are you sure they gave you the right brand? :what:
May I know is there huge difference between Sigma 50mm f/1.4 and Tamron 17-55 f/2.8 for Portrait purpose? Necessary to get two lenses?
May I know is there huge difference between Sigma 50mm f/1.4 and Tamron 17-55 f/2.8 for Portrait purpose? Necessary to get two lenses?
F2.8 has its uses also. Especially in a studio environment. Where large apertures are not needed. Sometimes you need a zoom for the nature of the event you are covering like sports and event shooting with flash or ample light.
Don't discount F2.8 too quickly.
kentwong81 said:Yes, I hope Nikon can come up with a 70-200 f1.4 or f1.8. Haha.
If they do, I will not want to carry it.
F stop is factor of focal length. For 200mm, do know how big the aperture at f1.4 have to be??
kentwong81 said:not now but technology will advance. Hopefully they can find a magic to make it.
Tamron boh 11-16/2.8 leh... very shocked to see the comment about it being plasticky, and negative comment about the AF/MF clutch. In fact it's one of the reasons why I like this lens so much. So easy to switch between AF and MF, instead of searching for the small little switch.
Nothing can overcome the laws of physics. Unless, of course if light stop traveling in a straight line.
You need a miracle.
Daoyin said:My friend, I understand your point completely but perhaps another analogy will serve better as light bends. Theory of Relativity.
Wonder how they can implement that in a len?
brapodam said:Eh bro, type too fast, this reminds me of a lot of the people who get flamed in CS :bsmilie: