R richliow New Member Jul 9, 2005 612 0 0 Apr 13, 2007 #1 Hi, I have been ogling the nikkor AF 14mm f/2.8D ED for a very long while, but found the price too steep.:dunno: Are there any similiar lense on the tamron or sigma side? thanks
Hi, I have been ogling the nikkor AF 14mm f/2.8D ED for a very long while, but found the price too steep.:dunno: Are there any similiar lense on the tamron or sigma side? thanks
yyD70S Senior Member Dec 25, 2005 2,451 0 36 Singapore Apr 13, 2007 #2 There is, at least to my knowledge, a Sigma equivalent; not sure about the price though. http://www.bythom.com/14lens.htm
There is, at least to my knowledge, a Sigma equivalent; not sure about the price though. http://www.bythom.com/14lens.htm
S Scaglietti New Member Jan 14, 2005 1,541 0 0 Apr 13, 2007 #3 richliow said: Hi, I have been ogling the nikkor AF 14mm f/2.8D ED for a very long while, but found the price too steep.:dunno: Are there any similiar lense on the tamron or sigma side? thanks Click to expand... Yes, both Tamron and Sigma has similar lens. Check their websites. They should cost S$1k+. BC
richliow said: Hi, I have been ogling the nikkor AF 14mm f/2.8D ED for a very long while, but found the price too steep.:dunno: Are there any similiar lense on the tamron or sigma side? thanks Click to expand... Yes, both Tamron and Sigma has similar lens. Check their websites. They should cost S$1k+. BC
E ExplorerZ Senior Member Jan 9, 2006 7,880 1 38 West Apr 13, 2007 #4 are you looking for 35mm FF lens? if not 10-20, 12-24 would be a better choice, imho
R richliow New Member Jul 9, 2005 612 0 0 Apr 13, 2007 #5 To all, thanks for the help ExplorerZ said: are you looking for 35mm FF lens? if not 10-20, 12-24 would be a better choice, imho Click to expand... just checking, why 10-20 or 12-24 will be better choice?
To all, thanks for the help ExplorerZ said: are you looking for 35mm FF lens? if not 10-20, 12-24 would be a better choice, imho Click to expand... just checking, why 10-20 or 12-24 will be better choice?
Kit Senior Member Jan 19, 2002 11,875 64 48 48 Upper Bukit Timah www.arkitecturalphotography.com Apr 13, 2007 #7 richliow said: To all, thanks for the help just checking, why 10-20 or 12-24 will be better choice? Click to expand... because if you are not using FF, those are probably the widest you can get at relatively affordable prices.
richliow said: To all, thanks for the help just checking, why 10-20 or 12-24 will be better choice? Click to expand... because if you are not using FF, those are probably the widest you can get at relatively affordable prices.
E ExplorerZ Senior Member Jan 9, 2006 7,880 1 38 West Apr 13, 2007 #8 richliow said: To all, thanks for the help just checking, why 10-20 or 12-24 will be better choice? Click to expand... google up "tokina 12-24"... loads of information comparing all the ultra wide (sigma 10-20, tokina 12-24, tamron 11-18)
richliow said: To all, thanks for the help just checking, why 10-20 or 12-24 will be better choice? Click to expand... google up "tokina 12-24"... loads of information comparing all the ultra wide (sigma 10-20, tokina 12-24, tamron 11-18)
yyD70S Senior Member Dec 25, 2005 2,451 0 36 Singapore Apr 13, 2007 #9 Yes, lots on information on superwides... tested on Shutterbug Magazine, a certain character by the name of Ken not-so-Rockwell... but amongst the best is this... http://www.nikonians.org/html/resources/nikon_articles/nikkor/af/wide_angles_shootout/index.html
Yes, lots on information on superwides... tested on Shutterbug Magazine, a certain character by the name of Ken not-so-Rockwell... but amongst the best is this... http://www.nikonians.org/html/resources/nikon_articles/nikkor/af/wide_angles_shootout/index.html
R Rashkae Senior Member Nov 28, 2005 19,085 14 0 Apr 13, 2007 #10 mcn said: tell me too Click to expand... Back to this style of posting? Just racking up your post count, huh?
mcn said: tell me too Click to expand... Back to this style of posting? Just racking up your post count, huh?
zac08 Senior Member Feb 21, 2005 11,745 0 0 East Apr 13, 2007 #11 Rashkae said: Back to this style of posting? Just racking up your post count, huh? Click to expand... Wat's new?? haiz....
Rashkae said: Back to this style of posting? Just racking up your post count, huh? Click to expand... Wat's new?? haiz....