lightning said:wow, worth considering.
For general use, If I already have a 20-35mm f2.8 L, a 90mm f2.8 prime, should I be getting a 135f2L or 200 f2.8L?
I do shot weddings, streets, and sometimes sports
You mentioned you do wedding, street and sports? Of these 2,with the exception of sports, when will 200mm (and above) be truly useful? Think about it. I don't ever see myself wanting to ever get the 200mm prime if i needed the range-i'll rather go for the 70-200 f2.8 then. At least there's more flexibility and i can stack on an extender if i wanted to.lightning said:But 135 f2L cannot use extender, while the 200mm can. Humm...which is more worth it?
If I am not wrong, 135 f2L can use with extender both 1.4 X and 2 X too ....lightning said:But 135 f2L cannot use extender, while the 200mm can. Humm...which is more worth it?