IF you can pay for a tele...
which should u go ?
purpoer : birding , animaling....
1.) Sigma 50-500
2.) Nikon 80-400
Nikon concern : Speed... slow... as not as fast as HSM but with VR
Sigma concern: Speed..... fast..... but no VR...
Picture quality of view...
seems... no much diff...
anyone can vote and tell me? advice is the best best...
But if you want to say : Buy both, or go for 300 f/2.8
then thank you, if i have that kind of budget, i've got it in my cabin now.
If you have some idea/advice which willing to share,
a thousand thx for u,
i'm nto trying to be nasty,
as u know... the coulture...
comment on others ppls comment....
that's not a bad thing if we talkign about the same thing...
but from what i see in this forum...
some is out of the topic.
which should u go ?
purpoer : birding , animaling....
1.) Sigma 50-500
2.) Nikon 80-400
Nikon concern : Speed... slow... as not as fast as HSM but with VR
Sigma concern: Speed..... fast..... but no VR...
Picture quality of view...
seems... no much diff...
anyone can vote and tell me? advice is the best best...
But if you want to say : Buy both, or go for 300 f/2.8
then thank you, if i have that kind of budget, i've got it in my cabin now.
If you have some idea/advice which willing to share,
a thousand thx for u,
i'm nto trying to be nasty,
as u know... the coulture...
comment on others ppls comment....
that's not a bad thing if we talkign about the same thing...
but from what i see in this forum...
some is out of the topic.