which camera is the best?

[ninelives]

thanks for your vote.

 

[Kei]

move to banal talk!

 

[rochkoh]

err... what are the choices again?

 

[Bluestrike]

hhmmm..
I was thinking that Minolta but then again mInOLta is not bad...
But so is MiNoLtA...
Damn... such a hard choice!































But after careful considerations, I think that they all SUCKS

 

[ckiang]

None of the above. Contax and Leica are the best for 35mm. :rbounce:

On the other hand, Me No Tar is not too bad. ;p

Regards
CK

 

[siron]

SONY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 707!

 

[kongg]

eh.....Minolta make camera wan meh???I tot they make photocopier machines onli???

 

[Jed]

True story, friend of mine just jumped from Minolta to *****. Serious post, he's looking to sell his Dynax 9, Sigma 28-70/2.8, 70-210/2.8 lenses. Amateur guy, takes good care of his stuff. Interested drop me a pm or email, I'll link you to him. Although, bear in mind he's in the UK, or Germany now more precisely, but no harm dropping an email... doesn't hurt.

 

[ninelives]

Originally posted by kongg
eh.....Minolta make camera wan meh???I tot they make photocopier machines onli???

u have violated the copyright law. this quote was from Jed.

 

[ninelives]

Originally posted by Jed
True story, friend of mine just jumped from Minolta to *****. Serious post, he's looking to sell his Dynax 9, Sigma 28-70/2.8, 70-210/2.8 lenses. Amateur guy, takes good care of his stuff. Interested drop me a pm or email, I'll link you to him. Although, bear in mind he's in the UK, or Germany now more precisely, but no harm dropping an email... doesn't hurt.

a few user i know have switched from *****/***** brand to minolta.

 

[eadwine]

eh why not sony 707!!!! :kok:

 

[ckiang]

Originally posted by ninelives


a few user i know have switched from *****/***** brand to minolta.

About the few gripes I have with Minolta systems:

1. Not many people have them - hard to borrow lenses and stuff.
2. Non-standard hotshoe.

The 7 and 9 are otherwise pretty capable. Wireless flash built-in is really something. No SU-4 or ST-E2 needed.

Regards
CK

 

[ckiang]

Originally posted by kongg
eh.....Minolta make camera wan meh???I tot they make photocopier machines onli???

So does *****. They make fax machines as well!

Regards
CK

 

[ninelives]

Originally posted by ckiang


About the few gripes I have with Minolta systems:


The 7 and 9 are otherwise pretty capable. Wireless flash built-in is really something. No SU-4 or ST-E2 needed.

Regards
CK

erm, the low end also bulit-in wireless flash capable. for example the 505si.

 

[Wai]

Originally posted by eadwine
eh why not sony 707!!!! :kok:

i still support 707 ok....even i change from silver to dark

IMO, 707 is the best prosumer DC out there....

i missed the F2.0 Carl Zeiss lens and macro at 2cm...

now using Klause's 38-76mm, f4.5-5.6...very happy with the focusing speed already even it is an unwanted lens as Klause put it....

i better dun try those L lenes.....cannot afford to be tempted by those...

 

[Jed]

Originally posted by ninelives



u have violated the copyright law. this quote was from Jed.

Haha well spotted!

It proves some people actually do read my rantings...

 

[Wai]

Originally posted by Jed


Haha well spotted!

It proves some people actually do read my rantings...

heard that u are very familiar with the law....are u?

 

[Jed]

Not at all. Wish I were. Probably come in slightly more useful at the present moment than what I know about photography... why? That probably wasn't copyright infringement if you're worried...

 

[Wai]

Originally posted by Jed
Not at all. Wish I were. Probably come in slightly more useful at the present moment than what I know about photography... why? That probably wasn't copyright infringement if you're worried...

your sentence very chim...got to read it 3 times to understand

 

[Jed]

Sentences... that may help in the understanding hehe.