thks for all the inputs. The fact I didn't put in the technical details like the directions the subject is flying, subject size, EV etc is that I don't suppose many would find these so helpful after all since given the best of the situation, even a P&S would be able to capture.
And again I'm not asking that a Oly can do all of the above photography majors but just how good they are. For. eg. season C & N users will know that C lenses are faster while KM has the most innovative flash system etc.
Tomcat is close to guess that I'm interested in the Oly system if not I wouldn't be posting here for comments. But the fact is after shooting decades of Canon, like you mention about the familiarity thing, yap, I did find a entry level Canon better to handle than a Oly.
My Canon system is film and because I'm very disappointed with Canon digital bodies, I sold off my 20D after a few months of using it. They are way overprice for the feature as compared to Nikon and now even further after I discovered about Oly.
I didn't need to advice anything for my friend and in fact at that shop, C, N and Oly was there for comparison and after the introduction by the salesperson, we are just so sick and disgraced about believing in C, N and S (yes we went to the gallery to check out before that) that we decide to get the E330 immediately.
I dare not comment anything about Oly lenses as I don't have the decade long experience to back on but feature wise they are still a distance from C but optically, as heard from others, at least they are not lower.
Generally speaking, unless u are a season bird shooter, equipment will help to improve the overall success rate and that is why when I use the E330 firing at the flying sparrow (left to right) about 10m-20m away, I got 100% of the bird in the frame but none of them are sharp. While my friend using the live view doesn't even get 1 at all.
After that incident, I was thinking maybe its just the lenses since they are entry level as well as how well the camera locks the subject. I'm thinking maybe the AF and metering mode may play a part also. But since we are all new, I suppose posting here to get a better idea will definitely help.
Be sure that I'm not comparing O vs N vs C thing as I respect and understand different people have different preference like I dun really like the E330 rectangular body but love the features :dunno: .
I was particularly laughing away at myself when I went to the Oly Japanese site about the live view advantages and swearing at canon for the $300 angle finder which I have to pay for low angle shot which is easily achieve using the tilted LCD of the E330. I also remember my leopard crawl at Korea taking photos bottom up and the extra thousands of dollars spend on tall tripods and monopods as well as the backaches I have to suffer on travelpods.:thumbsd:
All these can actually be achieved by an inexpensive body which C & N would have blown it up in marketing to charge their advocates piles and piles of $$$.:devil:
For my friend, its a simple decision to be made but with an arsenal of Canon stuffs at home, switching for me is not an easy decision just like many of you who have already pull the trigger.